Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book"

From Pathfinder Wiki
Talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book
Line 16: Line 16:
 
I have deleted the grid.  I have also changed [[Investiture Achievement/Friend/Honor Enrichment]] to include honor indexes in tabular form using [[Template:Honor_index]], having decided that once filtered, none of the indices are really too big to include on an IA page after all.  I did mix Arts & Crafts and Household Arts in one index, and Recreation, Vocational, and Outdoor Industries in the other.  It would have been easier to make five indexes, but I think I like two.  If someone cares that they are choosing A&C vs Household, they can always sort them by the Category column.  But I think it's better to have an intermingled list so they're paying attention to the honor rather than to which of the two (or three) categories.  I haven't addressed the other IA classes yet, as I wish to solicit opinions first. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 23:24, 9 December 2014 (EST)
 
I have deleted the grid.  I have also changed [[Investiture Achievement/Friend/Honor Enrichment]] to include honor indexes in tabular form using [[Template:Honor_index]], having decided that once filtered, none of the indices are really too big to include on an IA page after all.  I did mix Arts & Crafts and Household Arts in one index, and Recreation, Vocational, and Outdoor Industries in the other.  It would have been easier to make five indexes, but I think I like two.  If someone cares that they are choosing A&C vs Household, they can always sort them by the Category column.  But I think it's better to have an intermingled list so they're paying attention to the honor rather than to which of the two (or three) categories.  I haven't addressed the other IA classes yet, as I wish to solicit opinions first. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 23:24, 9 December 2014 (EST)
 
:I think it looks good. I tend to agree that a person pay more attention to the honor they'd like to complete rather than what category. The purpose of changing to the sortable indices was, after all, to make them sortable. Three as the max amount of categories I think is best. More than that and you might as well put the entire list of honors, because it gets really big. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 23:44, 9 December 2014 (EST)
 
:I think it looks good. I tend to agree that a person pay more attention to the honor they'd like to complete rather than what category. The purpose of changing to the sortable indices was, after all, to make them sortable. Three as the max amount of categories I think is best. More than that and you might as well put the entire list of honors, because it gets really big. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 23:44, 9 December 2014 (EST)
 +
::I don't think there is a case where IA calls out more than three categories, but if there are, I agree - three is the max.  Beyond that, we just link them to the pages.

Revision as of 12:04, 10 December 2014

New Icon

I'm not sure what exactly is wrong, but the "New Icon" graphic is not showing up in the main index. It will, however, show up in the individual honor categories, like Recreation or Vocational. Is this something wrong with my display or is anyone else experiencing this? --w126jep (talk) 13:11, 28 October 2014 (EDT)

It's working for me. Can you sort by the "new" column? --Jomegat (talk) 19:18, 28 October 2014 (EDT)
It is working now. I'm not sure what it could have been because I tried on different computers and logged off. Hopefully it doesn't happen again. --w126jep (talk) 22:09, 28 October 2014 (EDT)

Skill Level Grid

Is there any real reason to still have the grid below the Honor Categories that show the different skill levels and categories? I think the sortable list now takes care of that. --w126jep (talk) 10:40, 8 December 2014 (EST)

Not really. I think that perhaps the pages they point to should hang around though, and the IA pages that say "earn Nature honor at your skill level" could point to them. That was their original purpose, and it predates the IA pages (and the move from Wikibooks to here). The sortable table really does eliminate the need for a lot of pages like that. --Jomegat (talk) 12:26, 8 December 2014 (EST)
I agree that the pages should stick around, I just meant the big multi-color grid. I think I'll give it a week or so to see if anyone else has any opinions, and then probably get rid of it from the mainpage. --w126jep (talk) 12:43, 8 December 2014 (EST)
Sounds like a plan! --Jomegat (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2014 (EST)

Actually, maybe we could just come up with a workable spec for Honor_index and put those directly in the IA pages. --Jomegat (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2014 (EST)

How do you mean? --w126jep (talk) 19:07, 8 December 2014 (EST)
I was thinking that maybe tossing an index into the IA page might be a good idea, but I'm going to backtrack on that thought. Some indices are pretty large, and I think they would clutter the IA page. But to be clear, I am all for removing the grids. I think they exist on a lot of category pages too, but now that also they use the Honor_index template, they should lose the grid as well. --Jomegat (talk) 21:43, 8 December 2014 (EST)

I have deleted the grid. I have also changed Investiture Achievement/Friend/Honor Enrichment to include honor indexes in tabular form using Template:Honor_index, having decided that once filtered, none of the indices are really too big to include on an IA page after all. I did mix Arts & Crafts and Household Arts in one index, and Recreation, Vocational, and Outdoor Industries in the other. It would have been easier to make five indexes, but I think I like two. If someone cares that they are choosing A&C vs Household, they can always sort them by the Category column. But I think it's better to have an intermingled list so they're paying attention to the honor rather than to which of the two (or three) categories. I haven't addressed the other IA classes yet, as I wish to solicit opinions first. --Jomegat (talk) 23:24, 9 December 2014 (EST)

I think it looks good. I tend to agree that a person pay more attention to the honor they'd like to complete rather than what category. The purpose of changing to the sortable indices was, after all, to make them sortable. Three as the max amount of categories I think is best. More than that and you might as well put the entire list of honors, because it gets really big. --w126jep (talk) 23:44, 9 December 2014 (EST)
I don't think there is a case where IA calls out more than three categories, but if there are, I agree - three is the max. Beyond that, we just link them to the pages.