Difference between revisions of "Talk:AY Honors/Stewardship (General Conference)/Answer Key"
From Pathfinder Wiki
(Templating IA requirements = Bad Idea) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I think we should ditch the templated requirements for 3, 5, and 6. The original idea was to automatically include them in IA if they ever changed, but the recent change we just had illustrates that this just isn't going to work. I started to just paste the content in, but had second thoughts due to the translation tags. How should we handle this? --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 20:46, 12 December 2019 (EST) | + | I think we should ditch the templated requirements for 3, 5, and 6. The original idea was to automatically include them in IA if they ever changed, but the recent change we just had illustrates that this just isn't going to work. I started to just paste the content in, but had second thoughts due to the translation tags. How should we handle this? I already got rid of the inclusion in the Voyager IA class and just pasted the GC requirements in there (sans tags). There are other honor/IA links that do the same thing. We should fix those too once we figure out how to preserve the translations. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 20:46, 12 December 2019 (EST) |
Revision as of 01:48, 13 December 2019
I think we should ditch the templated requirements for 3, 5, and 6. The original idea was to automatically include them in IA if they ever changed, but the recent change we just had illustrates that this just isn't going to work. I started to just paste the content in, but had second thoughts due to the translation tags. How should we handle this? I already got rid of the inclusion in the Voyager IA class and just pasted the GC requirements in there (sans tags). There are other honor/IA links that do the same thing. We should fix those too once we figure out how to preserve the translations. --Jomegat (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2019 (EST)
