Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Division variant"

From Pathfinder Wiki
Line 3: Line 3:
 
# Delete all div variant disambig pages
 
# Delete all div variant disambig pages
 
# Make all NAD versions the landing page (delete the parenthesis NAD in the subpagename)
 
# Make all NAD versions the landing page (delete the parenthesis NAD in the subpagename)
# Add the new Division variant template
+
# Add the new Division variant template; update honor desc; delete noindex category
 +
# Add a redirect to the deleted NAD page
  
 
Hopefully, this will appease most about making the wiki more NAD-centric, while still allowing for other version of requirements. Also to help not create so many disambig pages. I already tried it with Welding. Let me know what you think!
 
Hopefully, this will appease most about making the wiki more NAD-centric, while still allowing for other version of requirements. Also to help not create so many disambig pages. I already tried it with Welding. Let me know what you think!

Revision as of 20:41, 21 March 2020

So this is a template that we could use to get rid of disambig pages for honors with division variants. It's just a first edition, we can tinker with it more to get it to what we really want. To use this template, we have to:

  1. Delete all div variant disambig pages
  2. Make all NAD versions the landing page (delete the parenthesis NAD in the subpagename)
  3. Add the new Division variant template; update honor desc; delete noindex category
  4. Add a redirect to the deleted NAD page

Hopefully, this will appease most about making the wiki more NAD-centric, while still allowing for other version of requirements. Also to help not create so many disambig pages. I already tried it with Welding. Let me know what you think! --w126jep (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2020 (EDT)

I like it! --Jomegat (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2020 (EDT)
We will need to leave redirects for the parenthetical NAD pages until Kevin can make any necessary adjustments. --Jomegat (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2020 (EDT)
I hadn't thought of that. If we just rename the page, it usually leaves a redirect, right? -- w126jep (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2020 (EDT)