Talk:Investiture Achievement - Revision history

W126jep: /* InvestitureAchievement.com */

2018-12-21T12:25:00Z

InvestitureAchievement.com

W126jep: /* InvestitureAchievement.com */ new section

2018-12-20T00:07:35Z

InvestitureAchievement.com: new section

W126jep: /* Investiture achievement site */

2018-05-29T20:42:43Z

Investiture achievement site

Ixoekea at 21:45, 28 May 2018

2018-05-28T21:45:07Z

Jomegat: /* NAD vs not NAD */

2014-12-14T02:35:59Z

NAD vs not NAD

JadeDragon: /* NAD vs not NAD */

2014-12-14T02:29:31Z

NAD vs not NAD

Jomegat: /* NAD vs not NAD */

2014-12-13T22:31:57Z

NAD vs not NAD

JadeDragon: /* NAD vs not NAD */ update with analysis

2014-12-13T19:29:53Z

NAD vs not NAD: update with analysis

JadeDragon: /* NAD vs not NAD */ differences?

2014-12-13T18:53:19Z

NAD vs not NAD: differences?

Jomegat: /* NAD vs not NAD */

2014-12-13T13:01:46Z

NAD vs not NAD

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 21 December 2018
Line 50:		Line 50:
	== InvestitureAchievement.com ==		== InvestitureAchievement.com ==

−	So now that [https://www.investitureachievement.com/ InvestitureAchievement.com] basically just links to the Wiki IA, I think we need to seriously perform an "audit" and make sure that all requirements are up-to-date and there are no broken or outdated links. I know that some minor changes were made here and there regarding corrections in the curricula (such as incorrect honors), I can only hope the PDFs ~~upload~~ to the IA website are the correct ones, since that is probably what we'll be comparing them to. Sooner would be better than later because I believe more and more people are going to start migrating this way as Oshkosh nears. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 19:07, 19 December 2018 (EST)	+	So now that [https://www.investitureachievement.com/ InvestitureAchievement.com] basically just links to the Wiki IA, I think we need to seriously perform an "audit" and make sure that all requirements are up-to-date and there are no broken or outdated links. I know that some minor changes were made here and there regarding corrections in the curricula (such as incorrect honors), I can only hope the PDFs uploaded to the IA website are the correct ones, since that is probably what we'll be comparing them to. Sooner would be better than later because I believe more and more people are going to start migrating this way as Oshkosh nears. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 19:07, 19 December 2018 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 20 December 2018
Line 47:		Line 47:
	Is it just me, or did the site go down over the weekend?--[[User:Ixoekea\|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea\|talk]]) 17:45, 28 May 2018 (EDT)		Is it just me, or did the site go down over the weekend?--[[User:Ixoekea\|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea\|talk]]) 17:45, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
	:I noticed that too. But it's up and running again. Whatever happened must have been fixed. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 16:42, 29 May 2018 (EDT)		:I noticed that too. But it's up and running again. Whatever happened must have been fixed. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 16:42, 29 May 2018 (EDT)
		+
		+	== InvestitureAchievement.com ==
		+
		+	So now that [https://www.investitureachievement.com/ InvestitureAchievement.com] basically just links to the Wiki IA, I think we need to seriously perform an "audit" and make sure that all requirements are up-to-date and there are no broken or outdated links. I know that some minor changes were made here and there regarding corrections in the curricula (such as incorrect honors), I can only hope the PDFs upload to the IA website are the correct ones, since that is probably what we'll be comparing them to. Sooner would be better than later because I believe more and more people are going to start migrating this way as Oshkosh nears. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 19:07, 19 December 2018 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 29 May 2018
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Is it just me, or did the site go down over the weekend?--[[User:Ixoekea\|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea\|talk]]) 17:45, 28 May 2018 (EDT)		Is it just me, or did the site go down over the weekend?--[[User:Ixoekea\|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea\|talk]]) 17:45, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
		+	:I noticed that too. But it's up and running again. Whatever happened must have been fixed. --[[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 16:42, 29 May 2018 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 28 May 2018
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Yup, the Achievement Classwork home page is all setup with the correct redlinks. I don't know ho to setup the requirements so they are not editable, so that's as far as I can go at the moment. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:29, 13 December 2014 (EST)		Yup, the Achievement Classwork home page is all setup with the correct redlinks. I don't know ho to setup the requirements so they are not editable, so that's as far as I can go at the moment. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:29, 13 December 2014 (EST)
	:Nice work! To create non-editable requirements, just create them on their own page using the [[Template:Requirement]] (first argument is the text, second is the requirement number). Then mark the page as protected (that's available to admins under the drop-down triangle along the top). Finally, transclude them into the section page. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:35, 13 December 2014 (EST)		:Nice work! To create non-editable requirements, just create them on their own page using the [[Template:Requirement]] (first argument is the text, second is the requirement number). Then mark the page as protected (that's available to admins under the drop-down triangle along the top). Finally, transclude them into the section page. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:35, 13 December 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	== Investiture achievement site ==
		+
		+	Is it just me, or did the site go down over the weekend?--[[User:Ixoekea\|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea\|talk]]) 17:45, 28 May 2018 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 14 December 2014
Line 41:		Line 41:

	Yup, the Achievement Classwork home page is all setup with the correct redlinks. I don't know ho to setup the requirements so they are not editable, so that's as far as I can go at the moment. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:29, 13 December 2014 (EST)		Yup, the Achievement Classwork home page is all setup with the correct redlinks. I don't know ho to setup the requirements so they are not editable, so that's as far as I can go at the moment. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 21:29, 13 December 2014 (EST)
		+	:Nice work! To create non-editable requirements, just create them on their own page using the [[Template:Requirement]] (first argument is the text, second is the requirement number). Then mark the page as protected (that's available to admins under the drop-down triangle along the top). Finally, transclude them into the section page. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 21:35, 13 December 2014 (EST)

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 :::I don't know when they updated, but I wouldn't say that they adopted the NAD's curriculum.  I have not studied it closely to see what exactly they changed from AY other than that they now call them Achievement Classes. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (EST)
-::I had no idea there was NAD vs GC class work.  I was trying to globalize the answers to the questions presented, never checking if there was a variation in requirements.  The GC requirements are substantially different, including different section headings and other major variations. We should set up a seperate index page and requirement pages for GC and clearly label IA as being NAD only.  Where there is overlap, we can translude answers. We should also modify the IA box I put on the Honors to say something about IA NAD. Create a similar box to insertion on honor pages for GC Achievement level tie ins - which will go on some of the same Honors and a few different ones. I also not that the GC just call the Advanced requirements for the ribbon Advanced rather than the silly Trail Friend etc names. I really want to make this resource usable worldwide. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]]
+::I had no idea there was NAD vs GC class work.  I was trying to globalize the answers to the questions presented, never checking if there was a variation in requirements.  The GC requirements are substantially different, including different section headings and other major variations. We should set up a separate index page and requirement pages for GC and clearly label IA as being NAD only.  Where there is overlap, we can translude answers. We should also modify the IA box I put on the Honors to say something about IA NAD. Create a similar box to insertion on honor pages for GC Achievement level tie ins - which will go on some of the same Honors and a few different ones. I also note that the GC just call the Advanced requirements for the ribbon Advanced rather than the silly Trail Friend etc names. I really want to make this resource usable worldwide. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]]
 ::::Before we cross link the honors with GC/NAD classwork, I would like to take some time to carefully study the problem.  It would be easy to do the first thing that comes to mind, and that could make a big mess.  We might also want to wait until we see how the NAD reacts to the SAD honors.  If we end up with division tabs, we could selectively display NAD or GC rather than displaying both.
 ::::As for transcluding sections, I think that would best be done with the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Labeled_Section_Transclusion labeled sections] approach I worked on last month. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 17:31, 13 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 13 December 2014
Line 36:		Line 36:
	::I don't know when they updated, but I wouldn't say that they adopted the NAD's curriculum. I have not studied it closely to see what exactly they changed from AY other than that they now call them Achievement Classes. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (EST)		::I don't know when they updated, but I wouldn't say that they adopted the NAD's curriculum. I have not studied it closely to see what exactly they changed from AY other than that they now call them Achievement Classes. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (EST)

−	::I had no idea there was an NAD vs GC class work. I was trying to globalize the answers to the questions presented, never checking if there was a variation in requirements. I~~'ll try~~ to ~~look into~~ this. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ~~([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 13:53, 13 December 2014 (EST)~~	+	::I had no idea there was NAD vs GC class work. I was trying to globalize the answers to the questions presented, never checking if there was a variation in requirements. The GC requirements are substantially different, including different section headings and other major variations. We should set up a seperate index page and requirement pages for GC and clearly label IA as being NAD only. Where there is overlap, we can translude answers. We should also modify the IA box I put on the Honors to say something about IA NAD. Create a similar box to insertion on honor pages for GC Achievement level tie ins - which will go on some of the same Honors and a few different ones. I also not that the GC just call the Advanced requirements for the ribbon Advanced rather than the silly Trail Friend etc names. I really want to make this resource usable worldwide. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, 13 December 2014
Line 35:		Line 35:

	::I don't know when they updated, but I wouldn't say that they adopted the NAD's curriculum. I have not studied it closely to see what exactly they changed from AY other than that they now call them Achievement Classes. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (EST)		::I don't know when they updated, but I wouldn't say that they adopted the NAD's curriculum. I have not studied it closely to see what exactly they changed from AY other than that they now call them Achievement Classes. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	::I had no idea there was an NAD vs GC class work. I was trying to globalize the answers to the questions presented, never checking if there was a variation in requirements. I'll try to look into this. [[User:JadeDragon\|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon\|talk]]) 13:53, 13 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 13 December 2014
Line 31:		Line 31:

	As we build out the GC pages, we can redo the main IA page to allow the visitor to select between GC and NAD (with NAD as the default). --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 18:40, 12 December 2014 (EST)		As we build out the GC pages, we can redo the main IA page to allow the visitor to select between GC and NAD (with NAD as the default). --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 18:40, 12 December 2014 (EST)
		+
	:Sounds good. I was not aware the GC decided to update and adopt much of the NAD curricula. How long ago did this happen? -- [[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 22:35, 12 December 2014 (EST)		:Sounds good. I was not aware the GC decided to update and adopt much of the NAD curricula. How long ago did this happen? -- [[User:W126jep\|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep\|talk]]) 22:35, 12 December 2014 (EST)
		+
		+	::I don't know when they updated, but I wouldn't say that they adopted the NAD's curriculum. I have not studied it closely to see what exactly they changed from AY other than that they now call them Achievement Classes. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (EST)