Template talk:AnswerRequirement - Revision history

Jomegat at 14:40, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T14:40:25Z

Jomegat at 14:35, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T14:35:36Z

DesignerThan: Created page with "I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a p..."

2020-11-29T09:21:09Z

Created page with "I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a p..."

New page

I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 29 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;)		I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;)
−	:Ugh. I didn't notice that I had placed the #lst outside the table. That parser function takes two arguments - the page, and section name. The reason the output was blank is because I hadn't yet converted the Amphibians honor to the new scheme. And now that I have... I see there is a problem with it in that the translation tags are getting displayed. That's fixable, but not conveniently. ~~Where does your code extract the requirement from the single req page?~~ ~~Is that in the css somewhere?~~ --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 09:35, 29 November 2020 (EST)	+	:Ugh. I didn't notice that I had placed the #lst outside the table. That parser function takes two arguments - the page, and section name. The reason the output was blank is because I hadn't yet converted the Amphibians honor to the new scheme. And now that I have... I see there is a problem with it in that the translation tags are getting displayed. That's fixable, but not conveniently. --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 09:35, 29 November 2020 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 29 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;)		I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;)
		+	:Ugh. I didn't notice that I had placed the #lst outside the table. That parser function takes two arguments - the page, and section name. The reason the output was blank is because I hadn't yet converted the Amphibians honor to the new scheme. And now that I have... I see there is a problem with it in that the translation tags are getting displayed. That's fixable, but not conveniently. Where does your code extract the requirement from the single req page? Is that in the css somewhere? --[[User:Jomegat\|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat\|talk]]) 09:35, 29 November 2020 (EST)