Difference between revisions of "Talk:AY Honors/Dinosaurs/Answer Key"

From Pathfinder Wiki
< Talk:AY HonorsTalk:AY Honors/Dinosaurs/Answer Key
m (Jomegat bot moved page Talk:AY Honors/Dinosaurs/Answer Key to Talk:AY Honors/Dinosaurs/Answer Key: Bot: Moved page)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:Also, when you finish writing a comment or question, make sure to end it wih 4 tildes, like this "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>". This will automatically generate your username and the time you posted your comment/question, once you save the new edit.--[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 22:26, 4 April 2018 (EDT)
 
:Also, when you finish writing a comment or question, make sure to end it wih 4 tildes, like this "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>". This will automatically generate your username and the time you posted your comment/question, once you save the new edit.--[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 22:26, 4 April 2018 (EDT)
  
:: What about moving the whole dinosaur tree explanation to the introduction section? It seems more useful there, than in the sauropodomorphs specific question, as it would give a context for all the other species mentioned. [[User:Marc3|Marc3]] ([[User talk:Marc3|talk]]) 09:01, 5 April 2018 (EDT)
+
:: What about moving the whole dinosaur tree explanation to the introduction section? It seems more useful there, than in the sauropodomorphs specific question, as it would provide context for all the other species mentioned. [[User:Marc3|Marc3]] ([[User talk:Marc3|talk]]) 09:01, 5 April 2018 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::We always want to try and tie answers to questions. I don't know that the questions before #3 relate to this answer. I can see what you mean that the scope of this answer seems to be too broad and doesn't specifically address the question, at least not at first. Maybe if it was rearranged so that the first part of the answer directly addressed the question, and then an explanation can be given as to where they fall within the dinosaur tree? --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 11:32, 5 April 2018 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 15:10, 19 December 2020

The requirements for this honor in English are arranged differently than in the original requirements from the SAD in Spanish. Is this English version the official adaptation of the NAD or was there a mix-up in the translation to English? Where did these English requirements come from? --w126jep (talk) 21:48, 10 October 2014 (EDT)

Shorten Answer

I think it is necessary to cut the text in section 3.5 d. What are the sauropodomorphs? ... it contains too much information besides what is been asked. Its companion image does enough to clarify where do sauropodomorphs fit in the whole dinosaur family tree.

Hi Marc3, I have to disagree. The Answer Book is about giving good answers, and many times they can be thorough answers. While true, we don't want to put an entire book on a subject, I think three paragraphs is not excessive, and the paragraphs give a little bit more knowledge nuggets that the chart doesn't.
Also, when you finish writing a comment or question, make sure to end it wih 4 tildes, like this "~~~~". This will automatically generate your username and the time you posted your comment/question, once you save the new edit.--w126jep (talk) 22:26, 4 April 2018 (EDT)
What about moving the whole dinosaur tree explanation to the introduction section? It seems more useful there, than in the sauropodomorphs specific question, as it would provide context for all the other species mentioned. Marc3 (talk) 09:01, 5 April 2018 (EDT)
We always want to try and tie answers to questions. I don't know that the questions before #3 relate to this answer. I can see what you mean that the scope of this answer seems to be too broad and doesn't specifically address the question, at least not at first. Maybe if it was rearranged so that the first part of the answer directly addressed the question, and then an explanation can be given as to where they fall within the dinosaur tree? --w126jep (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2018 (EDT)