Difference between revisions of "Talk:Investiture Achievement/Voyager/Outdoor Living"
From Pathfinder Wiki
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Requirements 2 & 3 are not showing up on this page and, try as I might, I'm not sure why. What's interesting is that req. 2 will show up on the Spanish version but req. 3 doesn't. How can we get these requirements to show? --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 15:25, 29 April 2015 (EDT) | Requirements 2 & 3 are not showing up on this page and, try as I might, I'm not sure why. What's interesting is that req. 2 will show up on the Spanish version but req. 3 doesn't. How can we get these requirements to show? --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 15:25, 29 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
| − | :I don't know exactly what the problem was, but I found that if I transcluded the pages for requirements 2 or 3 ''anywhere'' (even in other pages) they did not show up. | + | :I don't know exactly what the problem was, but I found that if I transcluded the pages for requirements 2 or 3 ''anywhere'' (even in other pages) they did not show up. That showed the problem was in the requirement page, not in the page that transcluded it. For the life of me, I could not see any difference between those pages and the ones that were working. I unfortunately had to resort to removing the translate tags (and marker) which fixed the page. Then I added the tags back , and remarked for translation. Both pages came up with different T markers, but both show up now. The why remains a mystery. Sorry, but you'll need to retranslate them I guess. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2015 (EDT) |
::I think I see it now - instead of a closing tag on the noincludes, the opening tags were repeated. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:58, 9 May 2015 (EDT) | ::I think I see it now - instead of a closing tag on the noincludes, the opening tags were repeated. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:58, 9 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::«The devil is in the details» just has a whole new meaning for me. I'm glad you were able to figure it out because it drove me almost insane. I would rather have to re-translate than to not have it working. Awesome job, thanks! --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 09:36, 10 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::That was a nearly invisible detail too. I wish I had seen it before I removed the translation markers. :-/ --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 16:42, 10 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 10 May 2015
Requirements 2 & 3 are not showing up on this page and, try as I might, I'm not sure why. What's interesting is that req. 2 will show up on the Spanish version but req. 3 doesn't. How can we get these requirements to show? --w126jep (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
- I don't know exactly what the problem was, but I found that if I transcluded the pages for requirements 2 or 3 anywhere (even in other pages) they did not show up. That showed the problem was in the requirement page, not in the page that transcluded it. For the life of me, I could not see any difference between those pages and the ones that were working. I unfortunately had to resort to removing the translate tags (and marker) which fixed the page. Then I added the tags back , and remarked for translation. Both pages came up with different T markers, but both show up now. The why remains a mystery. Sorry, but you'll need to retranslate them I guess. --Jomegat (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2015 (EDT)
- I think I see it now - instead of a closing tag on the noincludes, the opening tags were repeated. --Jomegat (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2015 (EDT)
