Difference between revisions of "Talk:AY Honors/Coquí/Answer Key"
From Pathfinder Wiki
< Talk:AY HonorsTalk:AY Honors/Coquí/Answer Key
(Created page with "I cannot get the "see also" advanced level to show in the honor descriptor box. I thought at first it might be because the system doesn't work well with accented letters, but...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I cannot get the "see also" advanced level to show in the honor descriptor box. I thought at first it might be because the system doesn't work well with accented letters, but it turns out that it works just fine in the Spanish version. Any ideas on what I might be missing? --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 03:27, 14 September 2015 (EDT) | I cannot get the "see also" advanced level to show in the honor descriptor box. I thought at first it might be because the system doesn't work well with accented letters, but it turns out that it works just fine in the Spanish version. Any ideas on what I might be missing? --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 03:27, 14 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | :The Honor_desc template looks for the advanced honor in "category/honorname - Advanced" - and since category is set to Nature, but the page is located in "Regional" it doesn't find it. We should probably rethink the Regional category and possible dispense with it. I don't know off the top of my head what the ripple effect of that would be though. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 20:25, 14 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:25, 15 September 2015
I cannot get the "see also" advanced level to show in the honor descriptor box. I thought at first it might be because the system doesn't work well with accented letters, but it turns out that it works just fine in the Spanish version. Any ideas on what I might be missing? --w126jep (talk) 03:27, 14 September 2015 (EDT)
- The Honor_desc template looks for the advanced honor in "category/honorname - Advanced" - and since category is set to Nature, but the page is located in "Regional" it doesn't find it. We should probably rethink the Regional category and possible dispense with it. I don't know off the top of my head what the ripple effect of that would be though. --Jomegat (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2015 (EDT)
