Difference between revisions of "Template talk:AnswerRequirement"
From Pathfinder Wiki
DesignerThan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a p...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;) | I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;) | ||
| + | :Ugh. I didn't notice that I had placed the #lst outside the table. That parser function takes two arguments - the page, and section name. The reason the output was blank is because I hadn't yet converted the Amphibians honor to the new scheme. And now that I have... I see there is a problem with it in that the translation tags are getting displayed. That's fixable, but not conveniently. Where does your code extract the requirement from the single req page? Is that in the css somewhere? --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 09:35, 29 November 2020 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 29 November 2020
I think the template still gets the requirement from the single req pages and not from the new one, because in the table is still the old code and below the table there is a parser function #ist I don't know, and that looks like the new code but it seems to me that it doesn't output anything. Maybe you can explain it to me Jomegat. I wasn't able to. But I have added the collapsible box ;)
- Ugh. I didn't notice that I had placed the #lst outside the table. That parser function takes two arguments - the page, and section name. The reason the output was blank is because I hadn't yet converted the Amphibians honor to the new scheme. And now that I have... I see there is a problem with it in that the translation tags are getting displayed. That's fixable, but not conveniently. Where does your code extract the requirement from the single req page? Is that in the css somewhere? --Jomegat (talk) 09:35, 29 November 2020 (EST)
