Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Outreach"

From Pathfinder Wiki
< Talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer BookTalk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Outreach
(sortable indices)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Sortable Indices==
 
Would there be merit in converting the category indices (such as this one) to using the honor_entry template as opposed to correcting the stage info here?
 
Would there be merit in converting the category indices (such as this one) to using the honor_entry template as opposed to correcting the stage info here?
Yes please.  Love the sortable lists too, but with three sections on this page not sure how that works. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 07:10, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
+
:Yes please.  Love the sortable lists too, but with three sections on this page not sure how that works. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 07:10, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
: "which are distributed outside of North America." Do you mean NAD or the continent? Remember that Mexico is part of North America geographically, but of the Interamerican Division. Is ACS now offered in Canada? Or still only ADRA? While official documents might state NAD is using ACS, reality might be very different. -- [[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 08:41, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
+
:: "which are distributed outside of North America." Do you mean NAD or the continent? Remember that Mexico is part of North America geographically, but of the Interamerican Division. Is ACS now offered in Canada? Or still only ADRA? While official documents might state NAD is using ACS, reality might be very different. -- [[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 08:41, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
 +
:::The three sections could be maintained separately by simply creating three different sortable tables.  And yes, the ADRA/ACS honors are still something of a mess.  Basically, the ACS honors should be used inside the NAD where ACS operates, and ADRA should be used everywhere ADRA operates, including those parts of the NAD where it is active (Canada).  IMO, the GC should unify those honors by offering ADRA/ACS options, but I don't call the shots.  --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 08:54, 22 October 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:54, 22 October 2014

Sortable Indices

Would there be merit in converting the category indices (such as this one) to using the honor_entry template as opposed to correcting the stage info here?

Yes please. Love the sortable lists too, but with three sections on this page not sure how that works. JadeDragon (talk) 07:10, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
"which are distributed outside of North America." Do you mean NAD or the continent? Remember that Mexico is part of North America geographically, but of the Interamerican Division. Is ACS now offered in Canada? Or still only ADRA? While official documents might state NAD is using ACS, reality might be very different. -- w126jep (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
The three sections could be maintained separately by simply creating three different sortable tables. And yes, the ADRA/ACS honors are still something of a mess. Basically, the ACS honors should be used inside the NAD where ACS operates, and ADRA should be used everywhere ADRA operates, including those parts of the NAD where it is active (Canada). IMO, the GC should unify those honors by offering ADRA/ACS options, but I don't call the shots. --Jomegat (talk) 08:54, 22 October 2014 (EDT)