Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Outreach"

From Pathfinder Wiki
< Talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer BookTalk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Outreach
(sortable indices)
(→‎Sortable Indices: ADRA Canada situation)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:: "which are distributed outside of North America." Do you mean NAD or the continent? Remember that Mexico is part of North America geographically, but of the Interamerican Division. Is ACS now offered in Canada? Or still only ADRA? While official documents might state NAD is using ACS, reality might be very different. -- [[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 08:41, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
 
:: "which are distributed outside of North America." Do you mean NAD or the continent? Remember that Mexico is part of North America geographically, but of the Interamerican Division. Is ACS now offered in Canada? Or still only ADRA? While official documents might state NAD is using ACS, reality might be very different. -- [[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 08:41, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
 
:::The three sections could be maintained separately by simply creating three different sortable tables.  And yes, the ADRA/ACS honors are still something of a mess.  Basically, the ACS honors should be used inside the NAD where ACS operates, and ADRA should be used everywhere ADRA operates, including those parts of the NAD where it is active (Canada).  IMO, the GC should unify those honors by offering ADRA/ACS options, but I don't call the shots.  --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 08:54, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
 
:::The three sections could be maintained separately by simply creating three different sortable tables.  And yes, the ADRA/ACS honors are still something of a mess.  Basically, the ACS honors should be used inside the NAD where ACS operates, and ADRA should be used everywhere ADRA operates, including those parts of the NAD where it is active (Canada).  IMO, the GC should unify those honors by offering ADRA/ACS options, but I don't call the shots.  --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 08:54, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
 +
:::::ADRA Canada is a funding agency for ADRA in other parts of the world. They also do grants for community service projects inside Canada but I understand we can not use the ADRA name on these projects or in our local Canadian churches outside of fundraising appeals for ADRA. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 16:12, 30 November 2014 (EST)

Revision as of 21:12, 30 November 2014

Sortable Indices

Would there be merit in converting the category indices (such as this one) to using the honor_entry template as opposed to correcting the stage info here?

Yes please. Love the sortable lists too, but with three sections on this page not sure how that works. JadeDragon (talk) 07:10, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
"which are distributed outside of North America." Do you mean NAD or the continent? Remember that Mexico is part of North America geographically, but of the Interamerican Division. Is ACS now offered in Canada? Or still only ADRA? While official documents might state NAD is using ACS, reality might be very different. -- w126jep (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
The three sections could be maintained separately by simply creating three different sortable tables. And yes, the ADRA/ACS honors are still something of a mess. Basically, the ACS honors should be used inside the NAD where ACS operates, and ADRA should be used everywhere ADRA operates, including those parts of the NAD where it is active (Canada). IMO, the GC should unify those honors by offering ADRA/ACS options, but I don't call the shots. --Jomegat (talk) 08:54, 22 October 2014 (EDT)
ADRA Canada is a funding agency for ADRA in other parts of the world. They also do grants for community service projects inside Canada but I understand we can not use the ADRA name on these projects or in our local Canadian churches outside of fundraising appeals for ADRA. JadeDragon (talk) 16:12, 30 November 2014 (EST)