|
|
| (310 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | If you have questions about any of the pages in this Wiki, you can ask them here. Just click the "Edit" button above and start typing. Be sure to sign the question by typing four tildes at the end of your questions like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.
| + | __NEWSECTIONLINK__ |
| | | | |
| − | [[Pathfinder Wiki:Community portal/archive|Archives]]
| + | If you have questions about any of the pages in this Wiki, you can ask them here. To do that, you will need to create an account, and then click the "Edit page" button at the top of this page and start typing. Be sure to sign the question by typing four tildes at the end of your questions like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. |
| | | | |
| − | ==Math== | + | ===<i>'''[[Pathfinder Wiki:Community portal/archive|ARCHIVES]]'''</i>=== |
| − | Mathematical formulae are broken at the moment. I'm working on a fix, but it's kinduva big upload, and it's taking a while. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 18:23, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Upgrade==
| |
| − | Our service provider will be upgrading the wiki software sometime next week. This is necessary so that we can install the translate extension and then begin to offer the wiki in more languages. I will back up the Wiki on Thursday evening (EDT) just in case. I would also back it up over the weekend, but... duties to my local club call. I will then begin making backups as I have time starting Monday-ish and continuing daily (as time allows) until the upgrade begins. Hopefully, the backups will turn out to be a total waste of my time, but I'm not willing to take that gamble. If something goes wrong, the wiki may be down for a little while. If worse comes to worse, I will at least have a backup of the database and can restore it on another machine. If the wiki goes down, look for info on the [http://www.pathfindersonline.org/forum/ Pathfinder Forum]. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] 23:04, 24 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Very nice, looking forward to it. -- [[User:W126jep|w126jep]] 23:28, 24 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Translation Issues== | + | == Wikibooks Pathfinder Honor Answers Update and Updated Honors Workbook == |
| | | | |
| − | ::The upgrade is complete. I will begin working on getting the Translate extension installed this week. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 17:45, 29 September 2014 (EDT)
| + | Hello all, |
| − | :::The Translate extension is ON now, and the Wiki is once again read/write. Let the fun begin! --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 12:43, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::It looks like I don't have permission to translate or am not a translation administrator. I'm not sure what needs to be changed to allow access to others to translate. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 17:48, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :::::I have now given you "administration" rights, which should give you translate admin rights as well. It also allows you to do other things that you need to be very careful about, including deleting pages, importing pages from other wikis, and blocking users. Use the tools wisely, and there is no penalty for NOT using them if you are not comfortable with them. I have also given JadeDragon admin rights. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 18:15, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::::Thanks, I will attempt to use it wisely. Is there a plan or a way so that the translation doesn't have to be done by approved administrators? We're just starting with translation but I imagine the idea is to eventually be able to have all cultures and languages working on the wiki. There would be a serious limitation problem if everyone has to be approved as a translation administrator. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 18:22, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :::::::Once a page is prepared for translation (i.e., add the translate tags and click the "mark for translation" link) then anyone who want to can create a translation in any language. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:16, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | <br>
| + | 2 questions: |
| − | ::Just a few things I'm realizing as I play around and experiment with the translation extension that maybe you have knowledge about:
| |
| − | :::1) It seems like all the templates will need to be translated as well, or new ones created into their respective languages. While I can change the names for the honors and their category, things like "skill level" and "year" still come up in English.
| |
| − | :::2) Once there are some translations made, I've gone back to the original page in English, but from there I have no idea how to get to the translated page. Is there a link somewhere I'm missing? Where can I click to get the translation already completed?
| |
| − | :::I'll keep researching and practicing, maybe I'll figure out some of these things.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ::::I noticed the Zoo visit list is picking up /en and /es pages as well as the no /page. That could get out of hand. Ideas? [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 14:30, 16 October 2014 (EDT)
| + | 1) I have 2 honors workbook, one from 2000 (or so) and one from 2014. However, there have been some new honors added since 2014 (i.e. Mobile Technology honor, in 2016). Is there an updated honor workbook coming to include the newer honors from 2014 onward, such as the Mobile Technology honor (and others)? |
| − | {{:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Zoo Visit}}
| |
| | | | |
| − | :::::I realize now that I've been inadvertently creating pages to be translated to English, which has the language code "/en". This would make these pages show up in the Zoo Visit as well. I went ahead and set the Creationism/en page for deletion, so hopefully it will not show up in the Zoo Visit list once it's completely removed. I also removed the Zoo Visit template from the Camelids/es page, but I'm not sure why it continues to pop up in the list. In the future, this should not be an issue, as the translated pages will work with the translated templates, and shouldn't show up in the English version. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 17:23, 16 October 2014 (EDT)
| + | 2) The current Wikibooks Pathfinder Honor Answers website isn't updated to reflect a lot of the newer honors, even the 2014 Honors book. Will the Wikibooks website be updated anytime soon? |
| − | ::::::Yeah, I think I can fix that. I'll just need to exclude honors that are not "primary" the same way we do that with the honor counts. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 17:37, 16 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | I believe the template takes some time to catch up to changes. Jomegat can you do the same exclude thing on the Master Award count main page - the translations have the count up to 27 Master awards now. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 19:48, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Didn't need to (I think). I just deleted the Master Award pages that had been accidentally translated into English. Waiting for the database to catch up right now. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:16, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==GC vs Division==
| + | If we are to broaden our young people's minds and help them grow, us leaders to keep up with the pace and bring everything up-to-date. |
| | | | |
| − | With all these division honors mixed into the Category pages it could be confusing as to where to get the patches. There seems to be two types of Division Honor
| + | Thanks for the reply! |
| | + | ~ Kris |
| | | | |
| − | ;a) approved and listed by the GC on their website & publications as Originating in XYZ Division. Advent<i>Source</i> or local conf should carry these patches. In my view these have been adopted by the GC while preserving the "originated by" status.
| + | :Hi Kris and welcome to the Wiki! Great questions. Here are my responses, you might get other responses from others too: |
| − | ;b) approved at a Division level but don't expect the patch to be stocked outside the division.
| |
| | | | |
| − | We have no clear way of distinguishing the two varieties right now.
| + | :1) The two workbooks you have, are they from the General Conference or from Advent''Source''? I ask because the GC Honors has not been updated since their last 2014 edition. However, Advent''Source'' prints material specifically for the North American Division and usually has their material up to date, according to the NAD. I would not know when the GC plans to update their material, especially since Andrés Peralta took over as the new world leader for clubs and is still trying to learn as much as he can. Many times the GC & NAD requirements can differ, so that might also be a discrepancy you also see; this wouldn't necessarily mean one is outdated, only that different versions exist according to their region. |
| | | | |
| − | I propose we split the Category pages into two lists (like we did in Outreach for ADRA/ACS) - General Conference and Division sections. Since there are only 3 Div with their own honors, we can further arrange NAD, SAD, and SAD honors into the three alpha columns with subheadings, like on the Regional index page. We should also consider leaving the "group a) (above)" honors in the GC list and dropping the Div icon as these honors are no longer truly Div honors. Where honors have multiple versions, link from each Div area the right honor. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 17:55, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| + | :2) This Wiki Answer Book is actually the most updated honors resource in the world. It is comprised of volunteers within the Pathfinder community who are constantly updating the content and keeping it to the day. If you are referring to the previous [https://en.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book Wikibooks] version, that is the old site and is no longer maintained. There is a message on the front page stating that it was moved to this Wiki. |
| − | :Very good suggestion. I think this would be one of the better ways to rearrange the main index. I'm not sure what you mean by "group a) (above)" honors, though. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 19:08, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::I would like to explore one other option before acting. There is Yet Another Extension called "Semantic Wiki" which would allow us to turn this site into something more akin to an application than a repository of Honors. We should be able to allow users to customize what honors they see. By default, it would be the ones they can get in their division. For this to work, we would want to tag each honor as "available in the NAD" and that would include all NAD and GC honors, and some SPD, TED, and other division honors. Users who create an account could customize these, and there would always be a link available to list the honors that are available outside the division.
| |
| − | ::I would rather not break the index into sections as proposed though, as people don't always read the introductory paragraphs (shock!). Instead, they skip straight to the first index they see and if they don't find the honor they're after there, they give up and assume we don't have it. By default, I would list them all, and maybe add a graphic along with the honor insignia if the honor has limited availability. But let's get the Translate stuff going first.
| |
| − | ::That said, I do support dropping the division icons from all honors that have been adopted by the GC. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 19:20, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :::I don't think users will create an account to filter - too complex. Would we need to tag each honor as available in the SPD etc? That is a lot of tagging. If I am sitting in New Zealand, can I get the NAD approved patches? I hope I am understanding this correctly. I'm going to go do a sample page now - we can always undo the revision. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 19:29, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::I agree that users would probably not create an account. And I also agree that users don't read introductions and skip straight to the list. Also, I believe it's true that the honors adopted by the GC and are sold at Advent<i>Source</i> no longer belong exclusively to their respective divisions, but just shows where they originated from. While we continue to brainstorm, if in the end nothing really changes, I think it'll look just fine with all the honors listed in the front page. I don't think worrying about where to get the patches is an issue, since a page was set up for just that. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 19:54, 30 September 2014 (EDT)<br>
| |
| − | ::::<br>This past investiture, myself and several other directors from the FL conference had questions and some issues with ordering patches. After many phone calls and e-mails back and forth with the FL Conference Director, we learned that Advent<i>Source</i> is being promoted as the official source and provider for Investiture supplies throughout the NAD and the GC. Except in FL (because for some reason, they have to do everything more difficult here), where the FL Pathfinder Online Store is the official resource for clubs in the state and clubs from FL don't have a code to access Advent<i>Source</i>. The FL Pathfinder Store is actually a branch of Advent<i>Source</i> where they specifically service the state. What I mean to say is, there <b>is</b> a clear way to distinguish between the two categories mentioned previously: if Advent<i>Source</i> sells it, it has been adopted by the GC. If it's not there, it can only be obtained from the respective division. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 20:07, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | Ok that fits with what I guessed. I used to order stuff from FL but they posted that after Aug 1 no more orders allowed for out of state, except for FL specific patches and we had to go through AdventSource. I don't have an AdventSource code (I am not in a Pathfinder Club, and my conf sells direct) so I can't even see what AdventSource lists for honors. So currently I can write a complete answer key for world-wide use but can't get the patch. Here is a sample page incorporating my thoughts http://www.investitureachievement.org/wiki/index.php?title=Adventist_Youth_Honors_Answer_Book/Outdoor_Industries_Div [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 20:45, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :That link isn't active yet. As for not being able to get the patches, I understand your pain. The NAD's intent was to protect the integrity of the insignia. They were afraid that people were just awarding themselves the patches without doing the work, so they asked FL to quit selling outside of FL. Can you talk to your conference youth director and explain your situation? Our conference gives the code to club directors so we can order directly from AS. Maybe yours would do the same for you. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 20:56, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::Cool. It's active ''now''. Love the made-up honor names BTW. :-) --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 20:59, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::I guess I should address the proposal too! I like it. I had missed the concept that this would be limited to the category pages, and not applied to the main index. In the old days when we used the 3-ring binder printed version, I never liked that they separated the division honors from the rest (including NAD honors!). I don't know how many times I had counselors tell me that the answers to some honor were not in the book. They were, of course, and as with the wiki, they only looked at the first index they saw. :-/ The more that things change, the more they stay the same. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:02, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :::One more thought. Maybe we should turn the index on the main page into a sortable table so that people could see them alphabetically, by division, by category, or even skill level. See [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sorting here] for info. I always liked the 3-column approach as I thought it was easier to find honors that way (and more compact). Maybe it's time to abandon that. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:08, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ::::I was talking about category pages only, W126jep may be suggesting the main index page too (I don't have an opinion on that yet). I think on the main index we should use the icons for Div specific (group b) but not Div initiated (group a) honors. Feel free to tweak the working page. | + | :I hope that helps clarify some things for you. If you still have some doubts, express them here and myself and others will answer to the best of our knowledge! --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 00:58, 26 May 2019 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | ::::Sortable would rock - maybe even eliminate the need to have the Skill Level grid at the bottom. Alpha - Category - Approving Entity - Skill Level - 100 px patch? however the more info the more room taken and its a long list. I think removing the whole alpha list and having people use the category pages would also be appropriate. Scanning 600 entries for the one you want, even if alphabetical, is tough.
| |
| − | :::::I'm working on a mock up in my [[User:Jomegat/main index|userspace.]]. I also had the idea of installing Yet Another Extension to automatically populate the skill level, intro year, originating institution - basically anything we throw in the honor_desc template. I'm also thinking that originating institution and authority are two different things, so maybe we should add them separately. The robot could make the initial edit, and then we could go through and make a list of honors that originated in a division and were later approved by the GC. The robot could then edit those pages to make adjustments. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:44, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::We need an honor for wikibuilding and advanced and (for you) super advanced. Would NH pioneer it? LOL
| |
| − | [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 21:18, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :::The sort list is spectacular. It would help unclutter the main page and keep information "above the fold". The only issue I have with demoting to only category pages is that I assume most directors and Pathfinders don't know how or where an honor is categorized and might spend unnecessary time searching or become frustrated. And I would be the first in line to try to earn a wikibuilding honor. --[[User:W126jep|w126jep]] ([[User talk:W126jep|talk]]) 21:40, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::I wanted a wiki trading pin featuring the "keys" image on the front page. It would be cool to be able to send those out to anyone who makes a constructive edit. But those cost bucks, and I am but a volunteer. Maybe I'll ask the NAD to invest. It might attract more editors. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:44, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Sortable List==
| |
| − | Last night while the wiki was read-only, I experimented with my own copy of the wiki on my laptop, basically implementing the sortable index. I guess I spent three hours on that, but the result looks pretty good. When I get home from work, I will upload the new index (and associated templates). As of now, there is a column for "year", but it's not filled in yet. I am exploring ways to make that automatic, by extracting it from the honor's page. I also did work to add the development stage (0-100%) to the honor_desc template, and will auto-extract that into the indices as well (so we don't have to update it in the main index and in the category indices). I've got a proof-of-concept working on the skill level column, but... I'm not sure I like it. The approach I took might make the site substantially slower. But it's a start. Since I am monolingual, I am happy to work on that sort of thing instead of translation. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 12:43, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Sortable list on main page looks awesome. How do we control the stage icon? [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 19:44, 5 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::I'm glad you like it. The stage data is extracted from the honor's honor_desc template (I added a "stage" argument). Just update it in the honor, and the index will get it. Whenever we're ready, we can switch the category indices over to use the honor_entry template too. I don't mind working on that, as it could be something I can program the robot to take care of. But I have to tend to non-wiki things this week, so I might not get around to it for a little while. Feel free to step in and try it out. I will eventually try to extract the year from the honor_desc template too, but the way I'm doing it now does not scale well. It's OK for only five stagesw, or three skill levels, but for 85 years of honor intro dates... that's going to be a problem. I will want to think about that some more before acting. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:36, 5 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| − | I dont see the year as a really useful thing to sort by except maybe to find new honors. Does anyone say "I'm going to earn honors from 1968 now"? I did some checking and everythings seems good, just the first honor I checked must have had different % between the Category and Front pages due to me not updating it. WAY easier to do the % update on the honor page instead of the really hard to read list! I'll keep working toward getting honors to 100% since I can't translate. JadeDragon
| |
| | | | |
| − | :Getting the year on the index page is definitely a low priority. The thought was that being able to sort by year would be a good replacement for the "new" icon. Actually... that could be automatic now, just by checking that the honor is in one of the categories for the past two years, and then adding the new icon. Hmm. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 21:34, 6 October 2014 (EDT)
| + | == E-Honors == |
| − | ::OK, that was easy. I usurped the "Year" column and made it the "new" column. "New" is any honor made in 2013, 2014, and getting ready for next year... in 2015. Sometime next year we should update the [[Template:isNewHonor]] template. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 22:11, 6 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Regional Honors Variations==
| + | Hi there, |
| | + | It's been awhile since I have been on here. I noticed many conferences are setting up Online Pathfinder honors (Video/Slideshow) Some require registration and others are being uploaded on youtube, vimeo or other websites. I was wondering what would be the best option to have this linked into a list? Where Pathfinders can watch the video's with the registration link to the conference or something. I would love to talk more on this idea via e-mail or messenger or something else to brainstorm. |
| | | | |
| − | When a local conference has an honor with the same name or subject matter as a GC/Div honor - even if the requirements are different, I propose we exclude the regional honor or clearly mark it as obsolete. Examples include Florida's Adventist Heritage,, Ukraine's Feltcraft, Backpacking & Adv, Camp Cookery. If a Div creates a variation, I propose we include it with a disambig page as has been our practice so far. SPD has a few variations we have not covered yet.[[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] 00:21, 25 September 2014 (EDT)
| + | This is currently what is available online coming up. |
| − | :Is it possible to include the different insignia image with the disambig pages? Ukraine has its own images and the FL Heritage Award does too, for example. -- [[User:W126jep|w126jep]] 00:33, 25 September 2014 (EDT)
| + | [https://kvisit.com/qwI/nvuuAQ Pathfinder Calendar] |
| | + | --[[User:Ixoekea|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea|talk]]) 22:19, 11 April 2020 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | ::Sure we can just add the image. would make the page look nicer. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 15:51, 30 September 2014 (EDT) | + | :We've noticed this too, and we're exploring possibilities. If you look in [[User:Jomegat/Do at home]] we have a list we're building of honors that can be done at home. That index is in my user space right now because it's not ready for prime-time. We might feature the index on the main page, or we might create a dedicated page for it. I'd love to hear any ideas you have - you can just put ideas on this page if you want, or even prototype something in your own user space and we could discuss it there.. --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 16:39, 12 April 2020 (EDT) |
| − | :::Once the Translate extension is up, we could select an image based on language. That's an imperfect solution, I know, but it might be pretty OK-ish. FWIW, I'm uploading the extensions now. They won't go live until I can get our service provider to run the update script though. How I wish I had shell access! --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 20:17, 30 September 2014 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | ::::i don't see how selecting by images by language helps anything - maybe I don't understand. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 14:31, 2 October 2014 (EDT) | + | :: What I'm wondering is I currently have a facebook group active but the amount of Honor's being videoed by different conferences is starting to become a lot. Like 3 conferences have done Peacemaking, 2 have done firesafety. There is about 20 so far in video's, with this pandemic going for awhile. I could see more and more conferences designing new video's. I know our conference is talking about it. What I am wondering is should these video's be merged into here somehow or would it be best to come up with another site all on Teaching (video's, powerpoint, etc) The video's do have registration links to the conference main site. Maybe link those video's back to here for the honor answer book. I'm just trying to figure out something to merge it all together. I'm open to any suggestions. The Calendar has been the best idea yet for whats coming. But I'm still kinda lost on a video database for the honors. I am thinking of a streaming setup for the videos. Just not sure where to start. |
| − | :::::I was thinking that in the case of the Ukranian honors, we could use the Ukranian version of the insignia in the Ukranian translation. I guess there's no en-fl (English for Floridians), so my suggestion doesn't make sense for that case. BTW, there is an en-ca. If you want to Candianize any of the honors (or just play around with the Translate extension). --[[User:Jomegat|Jomegat]] ([[User talk:Jomegat|talk]]) 18:20, 2 October 2014 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | Eh, Canadians are not that different! I'll stick to content creation. [[User:JadeDragon|JadeDragon]] ([[User talk:JadeDragon|talk]]) 15:28, 11 October 2014 (EDT)
| + | --[[User:Ixoekea|Ixoekea]] ([[User talk:Ixoekea|talk]]) 22:22, 12 April 2020 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Online Honor Videos == |
| | + | |
| | + | Hi all, |
| | + | |
| | + | My name is Pr Phil Yates from the Greater Sydney Conference (where I am one of the Youth Director and Pathfinder Director for the conference). I am so appreciative for THIS Pathfinder Website, it has helped and continues to help all of use Pathfinder Leaders down under in Australia and New Zealand. |
| | + | |
| | + | I have started Online honors for the Australian Union Conference and am presenting honors for the British Union Conference due to this COVID-19 lockdown everywhere - below is the YouTube Channel. |
| | + | |
| | + | https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQLzp8Fp2QbMXY8keb5rrYg?view_as=subscriber |
| | + | |
| | + | Along with this I do a worksheet and Certificate, once the Pathfinders have show evidence of completion. |
| | + | We have found that a lot of clubs across Australia are using it in there Pathfinder Zoom Meeting and Pathfinders are doing the Honors in there spare time. |
| | + | |
| | + | This channel is still in its infancy as I have only completed 5 honors - I am planning to release an honor every week. |
| | + | What I have done so far has received great feedback. |
| | + | |
| | + | Below is the dropbox with the sample worksheet and certificate. |
| | + | https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0marrqlhy2emf8b/AACuCNbWy5kUyQ11S6jmUCCGa?dl=0 |
| | + | |
| | + | I would be interested in you feedback. |
| | + | |
| | + | I would also be keen to help you all as much as I can. |
| | + | |
| | + | Blessings to all |
| | + | Phil |
If you have questions about any of the pages in this Wiki, you can ask them here. To do that, you will need to create an account, and then click the "Edit page" button at the top of this page and start typing. Be sure to sign the question by typing four tildes at the end of your questions like this: ~~~~.
Wikibooks Pathfinder Honor Answers Update and Updated Honors Workbook
Hello all,
2 questions:
1) I have 2 honors workbook, one from 2000 (or so) and one from 2014. However, there have been some new honors added since 2014 (i.e. Mobile Technology honor, in 2016). Is there an updated honor workbook coming to include the newer honors from 2014 onward, such as the Mobile Technology honor (and others)?
2) The current Wikibooks Pathfinder Honor Answers website isn't updated to reflect a lot of the newer honors, even the 2014 Honors book. Will the Wikibooks website be updated anytime soon?
If we are to broaden our young people's minds and help them grow, us leaders to keep up with the pace and bring everything up-to-date.
Thanks for the reply!
~ Kris
- Hi Kris and welcome to the Wiki! Great questions. Here are my responses, you might get other responses from others too:
- 1) The two workbooks you have, are they from the General Conference or from AdventSource? I ask because the GC Honors has not been updated since their last 2014 edition. However, AdventSource prints material specifically for the North American Division and usually has their material up to date, according to the NAD. I would not know when the GC plans to update their material, especially since Andrés Peralta took over as the new world leader for clubs and is still trying to learn as much as he can. Many times the GC & NAD requirements can differ, so that might also be a discrepancy you also see; this wouldn't necessarily mean one is outdated, only that different versions exist according to their region.
- 2) This Wiki Answer Book is actually the most updated honors resource in the world. It is comprised of volunteers within the Pathfinder community who are constantly updating the content and keeping it to the day. If you are referring to the previous Wikibooks version, that is the old site and is no longer maintained. There is a message on the front page stating that it was moved to this Wiki.
- I hope that helps clarify some things for you. If you still have some doubts, express them here and myself and others will answer to the best of our knowledge! --w126jep (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2019 (EDT)
E-Honors
Hi there,
It's been awhile since I have been on here. I noticed many conferences are setting up Online Pathfinder honors (Video/Slideshow) Some require registration and others are being uploaded on youtube, vimeo or other websites. I was wondering what would be the best option to have this linked into a list? Where Pathfinders can watch the video's with the registration link to the conference or something. I would love to talk more on this idea via e-mail or messenger or something else to brainstorm.
This is currently what is available online coming up.
Pathfinder Calendar
--Ixoekea (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2020 (EDT)
- We've noticed this too, and we're exploring possibilities. If you look in User:Jomegat/Do at home we have a list we're building of honors that can be done at home. That index is in my user space right now because it's not ready for prime-time. We might feature the index on the main page, or we might create a dedicated page for it. I'd love to hear any ideas you have - you can just put ideas on this page if you want, or even prototype something in your own user space and we could discuss it there.. --Jomegat (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
- What I'm wondering is I currently have a facebook group active but the amount of Honor's being videoed by different conferences is starting to become a lot. Like 3 conferences have done Peacemaking, 2 have done firesafety. There is about 20 so far in video's, with this pandemic going for awhile. I could see more and more conferences designing new video's. I know our conference is talking about it. What I am wondering is should these video's be merged into here somehow or would it be best to come up with another site all on Teaching (video's, powerpoint, etc) The video's do have registration links to the conference main site. Maybe link those video's back to here for the honor answer book. I'm just trying to figure out something to merge it all together. I'm open to any suggestions. The Calendar has been the best idea yet for whats coming. But I'm still kinda lost on a video database for the honors. I am thinking of a streaming setup for the videos. Just not sure where to start.
--Ixoekea (talk) 22:22, 12 April 2020 (EDT)
Online Honor Videos
Hi all,
My name is Pr Phil Yates from the Greater Sydney Conference (where I am one of the Youth Director and Pathfinder Director for the conference). I am so appreciative for THIS Pathfinder Website, it has helped and continues to help all of use Pathfinder Leaders down under in Australia and New Zealand.
I have started Online honors for the Australian Union Conference and am presenting honors for the British Union Conference due to this COVID-19 lockdown everywhere - below is the YouTube Channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQLzp8Fp2QbMXY8keb5rrYg?view_as=subscriber
Along with this I do a worksheet and Certificate, once the Pathfinders have show evidence of completion.
We have found that a lot of clubs across Australia are using it in there Pathfinder Zoom Meeting and Pathfinders are doing the Honors in there spare time.
This channel is still in its infancy as I have only completed 5 honors - I am planning to release an honor every week.
What I have done so far has received great feedback.
Below is the dropbox with the sample worksheet and certificate.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0marrqlhy2emf8b/AACuCNbWy5kUyQ11S6jmUCCGa?dl=0
I would be interested in you feedback.
I would also be keen to help you all as much as I can.
Blessings to all
Phil
